11/23/2023 0 Comments Reactos wikiThank you (User:213.54.71.145) for adding the shot of OO.org. I could not do it that day because my IP was blocked in Commons. Remember, Be Bold! - Ryanaxp 19:01, (UTC) I did as ready replace a old with a OO.org one. Shouldn't be hard to do if you've the notion. Screenshots can be found on and the remastered logo on - User:213.54.71.145 14:41, (UTC) It would be nice if someone could update/remove update the images, because they are all outdated, except the desktop one which does not fit in "future". Although I still disagree with your assertion, and I haven't quite figured out what the e-mail you pasted above signifies, you've made your feelings known and I'm not inclined to research this any further. In any case, I'm not about to get in an edit war with an anonymous user over something like this. If I were the defensive type, I might get a bit miffed at being slagged off like that-lucky thing I'm the laid-back type, so I'll just ask you for an apology instead. Whoa, hold on there-despite any quibble we're having regarding this (rather inconsequential) bit of minutiae, there's really no grounds for you to haul off and accuse me of authorship bias. I'm sorry for dropping your work but it's out of date. It should also be mentioned that Ryanaxp does not really have an objective view on this, because he wrote this part of the history section. Everything should still be proper english (since that I just removed things). To just "Windows Workstation", that is and will be correct in anyway. The goal for version 1.0 was articulated as a stable implementation of a subset of Windows NT 4.0 Workstation I removed a the first part of the history again changed the sentece But I do neither agree with the current content, sice it give the impression that ReactOs is based on "stone age software". I did not rerevert the changes related to Windows 2000, because of the reasons Ryanaxp mentioned. I have rereverted some of my stuff (with a few minor corrections) since they were correct edits in my mind. (If they were ever existing)Īnd for the grammatical and spelling errors I'm sorry I was a bit in a hurry yesterday. But I would say that ReactOs is just not that strictly organized that the 1.0 release plans ever officaly changed. Yes, it is only the reported version, if you do still not believe me, I'll ask on IRC, what the compatibly for 1.0 is. Also I propose we just report Service Pack 4. Reports a value as NT4 or something ReactOS dependent please change it to match Windows 2000īehavior. If you find any places where a function, resource or anything Reported as the version number as many newer applications such as Office 2003 will not install Most of the dev team seems to be in agreement with bumping the reported version number to Win2kīut if anyone has any objections speak now or forever maintain a patch. The title is " Update reported version to Windows 2000 (Service Pack?)" from Steve Edwarts I could not find it online so I posted it here. and i specifically said "the tantalising possibility exists". Rather, although much of the later functionality from Windows 2000, XP and so on are being developed, that is simply because those are sub-projects that various contributors feel important and which do not detract from the previously stated goal of NT 4.0 compatibility for a future "ReactOS 1.0" release.(That is to say, it seems clear that Windows 2000 or XP or somesuch will be a future "official" emulation goal for ReactOS however, the features of the later versions of Windows are cumulative, so reaching 4.0 compatibility may be achieved while simultaneously implementing 2000 or XP features-the two are not mutually exclusive.) Furthermore, the other edits were largely broken English and added nothing factual-indeed, they often gutted perfectly intelligible sentences and facts, while substituting dubious facts (for example, can anyone point out support for the assertion that ReactOS is targetting an architecture known as "Xen?") thus I reverted the article wholesale to the previous version by Blackcats, after scrutinizing the later edits for anything worth keeping (but found none).- Ryanaxp 03:12, (UTC)ġ0oct2005:lkcl: XEN is not an architecture it's a virtualisation technology, similar to vmware. For one thing, my review of the ReactOS developer's mailing list archives did not turn up any evidence of a concrete change of the initial emulation goal from Windows NT 4.0. 4.244.105.121 22:21, (UTC) Frankly, many of the edits by 213.54.64.78 seem unsubstantiated at best, and many were retrograde in my opinion. Something about that change in the developers' focus should probably be added to the article. I have remove all stuff that was releated with NT 4.0 because Reactos-Developers choosed to hunt toward 2000 complatilbty now. Change of compatibility goal from Windows NT 4.0 to Windows 2000
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |